tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-64541692024-03-07T10:32:29.574-08:00Kafir Nation<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v219/dreadmore/logony.jpg">
TEAM KAFIRNATION BLOG
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE A CONTRIBUTOR
PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO KAOSKTRL@GMAIL.COM
You have something to say, say it here.LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00740524716483882744noreply@blogger.comBlogger90125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-39207506822059422532010-01-15T17:56:00.000-08:002010-01-15T17:59:01.901-08:00<a href="http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/15/tea-party-leaders-see-movement-becoming-a-potent-force/">Tea Party Leaders See Movement Becoming a Potent Force</a>LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00740524716483882744noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1172203587999312382007-02-22T19:57:00.000-08:002007-04-05T21:31:11.983-07:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/1600/716399/hannibal.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/320/947164/hannibal.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><strong>Calling it Like I See It</strong><br /><br />.....(M)any of us have been screaming the same message for so long at people, some of us even in person, and still are being ignored, that writing about our desire to protect Western Civilization from the threats from within and without grows stale at times. I commented on an inside joke I have with myself that I just want to keep posting my own older posts but in larger type and with sirens blaring. I've already SAID IT. I can only apply the same message to newer stories before I just start thinking that the world is upside down. It is a bit like the police station scenes in the 1984 film "The Terminator"; (hey, my start was with movie analogies, if you will all remember;). Trying while handcuffed to convince people of a wasteland future and a Cyborg that could arrive at any moment while they all just call you nuts and/ or ignore you. That's right, I am the Kyle Reese of the new century.<br /><br />Regarding another angle of this problem, in my convalescence I have discovered numerous sites on a sliver of the "blogosphere" which serve no purpose whatsoever other than to bash the anti-jihadi side of the blogs (that's us, though the main mentions are Malkin, "L'il Green Fascists", and other very high traffic sites). They offer no solutions, they serve only to mock others, from anyone who likes the television show "24" (Oh, please check out <a href="http://www.thepoorman.net/2007/02/16/the-other-worst-thing-in-the-world/">THIS</a> piece of banality from "The Editors" at <a href="http://www.thepoorman.net/">The Poor Man Institute Blog</a>) or simply to endless comments (usually running at about 200-300 or more per post at this idiot's <a href="http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/">'Best New Blog'</a>), almost all directed at, well, anti-jihadi bloggers. And boy do they HATE Michelle Malkin. Whatever form of the endtimes they accept, they seem to have accepted Ms. Malkin as the harbinger of the beginning of the end. No, wait, this unappreciated bugger from the "left" side of the blogs (they go through great pains to stress how much they are ignored and underfunded while right-leaning bloggers are all raking it in, so, hey cheers to us! From my empty wallet to yours) has already left for new blog digs at <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/">Salon.com</a>. I guess he has proven that point about being the underdog and all now, as well as he has considered to have done his job defining "fascism" as all of us and Michelle Malkin. Glenn, whatever-the-hell, there's a difference in writing well and writing the sort of essays that get noticed by outlets like Salon.com. Might I say "code speech"? Wait, that's OUR angle, right (no pun intended)?<br /><br />(....)<br /><br /><strong> Update:</strong><br /><br />"The Editors" at www.poorman.net have proven their obsession with other bloggers by devoting a <a href="http://www.thepoorman.net/2007/02/21/the-institute-now-87-worse-than-hitler/#comments">post</a> to this post. The comments are highly amusing. They all remind me of my younger years reading "The New Yorker" only to end up hoping for a world with real responses and real expression of ideas and not such effete wispyness. Visitors from The Poor Man Institute are further directed to leave any comments on this post at the post on this matter at the <a href="http://mavericknewsnetwork.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/02/yes_i_am_the_tr.html#comment-61171368">Maverick News Media</a>. Sorry, just one of those "if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there" sort of requests...LOL....I doubt if I really count as C-List. Leave that for people who really do update their blogs.<br /><br />Read my article in full <a href="http://whatwouldcharlesmarteldotm.blogspot.com/2007/02/strategic-shifts-anti-anti-jihadi.html">here</a>, and visit the Poorman Institute only if you want to see people committing civilization suicide while being self-centered enough to have almost 100 comments devoted to bashing your humble correspondent.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1168552453701398862007-01-11T13:52:00.000-08:002007-03-21T09:40:10.840-07:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/1600/106864/NazaninInCourt.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/320/816343/NazaninInCourt.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><strong>Nazanin Retrial Report</strong><br /><br />Source APTN (Associated Press)<br /><br />The court proceedings were supposed to begin at 10:30 local time (07:00 GMT). There was a 2-hour delay due to the massive interest (there were over 200 people cramming to get into the courthouse).<br /><br />Proceedings, as a result, were carried out in an adjacent amphitheatre. There were four judges presiding over the hearings plus Nazanin's two lawyers. Nazanin's lawyers did most of the speaking, but she presented her side of the story briefly as well.<br /><br />The court's decision: what Nazanin did was not premeditated murder. The judges added that the previous court's verdict was partly based on unreliable and inaccurate testimony.<br /><br />The court did not go as far as staying the execution today. But the family expects a formal letter to that effect in the coming days.<br /><br />Despite the absence of a formal repudiation today, this is very positive news, no doubt, and the family is quite hopeful.<br /><br /><br />--Courtesy of SaveNazanin, along with the picture of Nazanin Fatehi getting to finally see her little brother. The decision may come in next week. Keep in mind, this young woman is being kept in Iran's most notorious prison, Evin Prison, where she was beaten for her first two days until she was forced into a confession. Many succumb to these "interrogations" by going to the grave early, as did Canadian-Iranian Zahra Khatami. Keep in mind as well, Nazanin went to the police HERSELF to report the attempted rape of herself and her (then) 15 year old niece. She has cried on the phone in conversations with her Mother, as shown in the 30 minute film, "Tale of Two Nazanins", always begging her family and those aiding them to understand that she's innocent. <br /><br />Nazanin Fatehi is a very brave woman, as was exhibited by her amazing ability to fend off her rapists. She has, however, suffered heart attacks in prison from the stress (and likely also the conditions there). While there are still protests against the hanging of Saddam, there is not yet widespread protest of all those being tortured, imprisoned, disappearing and being hanged after arrests in Iran. The comparison of publicity speaks volumes, doesn't it? Nazanin in turn has spoken out for all those in her situation:<br /><br />"My message to the people of the world is that outside of this prison is also a prison. It is not only this "unfortunate Nazanin" that is in prison. So please don't just help me, help all "Nazanins" go back to a normal life."<br /><br />--Nazanin Fatehi<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Nazanin/">petition</a> has finally passed 300,000 signatures, the meager goal of those heading the movement to save Nazanin, namely Nazanin Afshin-Jam. Please sign it if you haven't already.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1167876101103004872007-01-03T18:01:00.000-08:002007-04-15T09:17:30.063-07:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/1600/53375/1435499899_l.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/320/366829/1435499899_l.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />I wanted to repost this bulletin I have received from a group trying to save the life of Nazanin, the young woman who is in danger of execution in Iran quite soon. If not familiar with her case, please look her up! She protected herself and a female relative from rape with a knife she carried (makes Tehran sound so pleasant already, doesn't it?), the injuries causing death to one of the men. This was self defense, and she may hang for it. Please read and forward on as time is short for her now:<br /><br />"URGENT ACTIONS NEEDED: Final trial in ONE WEEK. Death sentence pending. <br /><br /><br /><br />So many of you have asked what else can be done to help Nazanin in these final days before her final re-trial on January 10. <br /><br />We will post different actions in the next few days. <br /><br />1- It is important that AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE send a copy of the petition that is signed by nearly 230,000 worldwide to the highest authorities of Islamic Republic in Iran. It would be more effective if you write your own cover letter. Please ask everyone you know to email or fax the petition too. <br /><br />Let's join hands and prove to the world that together we can make a difference and let's tell these officials that SELF DEFENSE IS A HUMAN RIGHT and tell them that people worldwide including nearly 230,000 who signed the petition are watching. This only will take a few minutes of your time but can save Nazanin's life. Let's make 2007 a happy year for Nazanin too. <br /><br />LINK TO PETITION: <br />http://www.petitiononline.com/Nazanin/ <br /><br />There are three high officials to send the petition to: <br /><br />AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI <br />Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic <br />Email: info@leader.ir <br />Email: istiftaa@wilayah.org <br />Fax: 01198251 77742228 <br />(mark "FAO the Office of His Excellency, Ayatollah al Udhma Khamenei" Salutation: Your Excellency) <br />************************************ <br /><br />AYATOLLAH MAHMOUD HASHEMI SHAHROUDI <br />Head of Judiciary of Islamic Republic <br />Email: irjpr@iranjudiciary.org <br />FAX: 0119821 3904986 <br />(mark "Please forward to His Excellency Ayatollah Shahroudi") <br />note: This email address can be unreliable. <br />Salutation: Your Excellency <br />********************************************* <br /><br />MAHMOUD AHMADNEJAD <br />President of Islamic Republic <br />Email: dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir <br />or you can email direct through his website at: <br />www.president.ir/email <br />FAX: 0119821 66495880 <br />Salutation: Your Excellency <br /><br />Thank you"Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1167451604718109012006-12-29T20:04:00.000-08:002007-01-14T12:51:31.910-08:00<span style="font-family:arial;font-size:180%;"><strong><em>Saddam Executed!</em></strong><br /></span><br /><a href="http://www.driko.org/blogicons/southpark_410_saddam_satan.gif"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://www.driko.org/blogicons/southpark_410_saddam_satan.gif" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240057,00.html">Dead and Gone</a>LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00740524716483882744noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1167277964409693152006-12-27T19:40:00.000-08:002006-12-27T19:52:44.430-08:00VIDEO: <a href="http://www.blogger.com/" v="Qe-cggDlXuk">The Cause Of allah</a><br />------------------------------<br /><br /><strong>The Cause of allah</strong><br /><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;">fight and kill, oppress or bring under subjection the disbelievers, establish islam over all mankind. Those who do not fight must use their material wealth or services to assist those who fight. This is not an option, it is a mandate. Those who do not participate in jihad are hardly true mohammadans. Resistance is not futile no matter what the left (who is aligned with mohammadanism) would have us believe. Our cause is the cause of freedom, those of us who do not directly fight on the battlefield support with our material wealth and services those who do. This is why the left wants us out of the GWOT, they do not want the cause of allh to be resisted, they do not want Americans to spend their material wealth fighting in the cause of freedom. From the first days before the operations in Iraq began the carping left was harping about the cost of going to war. For them the idea that material wealth should be used to support the cause of freedom is a terrible thing. Why? Because it allows the fighters to continue the fight, this is something they do not want.<br /><br />Al-qaeda made the claim that it was responsible for the defeat of Republicans in the last election. And in a sense I suppose they could make that claim as they and the dhimmicratic party used the same talking points about Bush, the war, and a supposed American defeat in this cause of American freedom. The left and the mohammadans worked together in the cause of allh, by supporting the same talking points through the media they spread the cause of allh to America. Liberals by refusing to fight the enemy are themselves serving in the cause of allah, they have become jihadits and support the enemy with their substance.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">Volume 4, Book 52, Number 44: Narrated Abu Huraira: A man came to Allah's Apostle and said, "Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad (in reward)." He replied, "I do not find such a deed." Then he added, "Can you, while the Muslim fighter is in the battle-field, enter your mosque to perform prayers without cease and fast and never break your fast?" The man said, "But who can do that?" Abu- Huraira added, "The Mujahid (i.e. Muslim fighter) is rewarded even for the footsteps of his horse while it wanders bout (for grazing) tied in a long rope."<br /><br />Volume 4, Book 52, Number 46: Narrated Abu Huraira: I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "The example of a Mujahid in Allah's Cause-- and Allah knows better who really strives in His Cause----is like a person who fasts and prays continuously. Allah guarantees that He will admit the Mujahid in His Cause into Paradise if he is killed, otherwise He will return him to his home safely with rewards and war booty."<br /><br />Volume 4, Book 52, Number 58: Narrated Jundab bin Sufyan: In one of the holy Battles a finger of Allah's Apostle (got wounded and) bled. He said, "You are just a finger that bled, and what you got is in Allah's Cause."<br /><br />Volume 4, Book 52, Number 59: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is! Whoever is wounded in Allah's Cause....and Allah knows well who gets wounded in His Cause....will come on the Day of Resurrection with his wound having the color of blood but the scent of musk."<br /><br />Qur'an:9:88 "The Messenger and those who believe with him, strive hard and fight with their wealth and lives in Allah's Cause."<br /><br />Qur'an:9:5 "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."<br /><br />Qur'an:9:112 "The Believers fight in Allah's Cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed."<br /><br />Qur'an:9:29 "Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission."<br /><br />Ishaq:325 "Muslims, fight in Allah's Cause. Stand firm and you will prosper. Help the Prophet, obey him, give him your allegiance, and your religion will be victorious."<br /><br />Qur'an:8:39 "Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah."<br /><br />Qur'an:8:39 "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world)."<br /><br />Ishaq:324 "He said, ‘Fight them so that there is no more rebellion, and religion, all of it, is for Allah only. Allah must have no rivals.'" </span>LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00740524716483882744noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1167277134117325512006-12-27T19:36:00.000-08:002006-12-27T19:38:54.133-08:00<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:130%;"><strong>Walid Shoebat</strong></span><br /><br /><a href="http://www.stuckmojo.us/audio/Stuck_Mojo_For_The_Cause_Of_Allah.mp3">The Cause Of allah</a>LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00740524716483882744noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1165272789180792882006-12-04T14:52:00.000-08:002007-04-12T09:30:06.770-07:00<h3 class="post-title"> Shining a light in the dark places of history </h3> Pope Benedict's visit to Byzantium highlights four things: Islam's historic barbarism against non-Muslims; the hatred and contempt its adherents feel toward the Infidel, even in today's tolerant, secular, modern, EU-courting Turkey; the unjustifiable millennium-old division within Christendom, the absence of which five centuries ago may have prevented the unspeakable evil carried out inside the walls of the great city Constantinople and its jewel, Hagia Sofia; and the utter ignorance and malfeasance of the West's intellectual, political, and media elite.<br /><br /><a set="yes" href="http://www.examiner.com/a-424307%7EPope_Urges_Leaders_to_Renounce_Violence.html?cid=rss-World">Benedict visits Turkey</a>:<br /><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">ANKARA, Turkey - Pope Benedict XVI urged leaders of all religions Tuesday to "utterly refuse" to support any form of violence in the name of faith, while Turkey's top Muslim cleric complained to the pontiff of growing "Islamophobia" in the world.</span><br /></blockquote>Here we see the Pope's discretion and Islam's utter inability to avoid the ironic. If the world is Islamophobic ("phobic" implies the <span style="font-style: italic;">irrational </span>fear of something), then it is because too many of the Ummah are carrying out violence against and seeking to intimidate into compliance non-Muslims in the name of their god.<br /><br />By one count, Muslims have carried out nearly 7000 terrorist attacks <span style="font-style: italic;">since 9/11</span>.<br /><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">As he began his first visit to a Muslim country - a trip that drew extraordinary security but few onlookers - Benedict sought a careful balance as he extended friendship and brotherhood to Muslims, hoping to end the outcry from many Muslims over his remarks linking Islam to violence.</span><br /></blockquote>The outcry was not because of a false claim, it was because a non-Muslim had the audacity to speak of the Religion of Hate in a less-than-approving tone.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...the German pope also hammered away at key points of his 18-month papacy, telling diplomats that leaders of all religions must "utterly refuse to sanction recourse to violence as a legitimate expression of faith."</blockquote>Obviously, Benedict was referring in a very diplomatic way to the Religion Which Cannot Be Named, since it is Mahomet's god requiring the fighting against, subduing and humiliating, and killing of non-Muslims to make the world Islam.<br /><br />I haven't seen lately any Methodists beheading girls on their way to school as an "act of charity."<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">He avoided mention of any specific religion, even as he decried terrorism and the "disturbing conflicts across the Middle East."</blockquote>This begs the question: If Media can read between the lines when Benedict gently admonishes Islam, why can't it comprehend the giant, fifty-foot billboards from Allah painted in Infidel and Apostate blood? Why must it always be "alienated youths" or "insurgents" reacting to perceived (and fabricated) offenses?<br /><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Benedict also said guarantees of religious freedom are essential for a just society, and the Vatican said he raised specific issues such as property rights of Turkey's tiny 32,000-member Catholic community during talks with Turkish officials.</span><br /></blockquote>And how did the people of what was once a Christian kingdom come to have its religious liberties denied? A quick read of "On the Fall of Constantinople" (top right <a href="http://amillennialist.blogspot.com">here</a>) will help answer that question.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">His comments could be reinforced later during the four-day visit when the pope meets in Istanbul with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, the spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians.<br /><br />The pope is expected to call for greater rights and protections for Christian minorities in the Muslim world, including the small Greek Orthodox community in Turkey.<br /></blockquote>That there is any Christian presence left in Muslim lands is testament to the grace of God and the spirit of the people.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...Benedict's journey is extraordinarily sensitive, a closely watched pilgrimage full of symbolism that could offer hope of religious reconciliation or deepen what many say is a growing divide between the Christian and Islamic worlds.</blockquote>What is the reason for that divide? Could the commands to "...kill the unbelievers wherever you find them," "Fight against...the People of the Book until they feel themselves subdued and pay the jizya," and "When you meet the unbelievers...invite them to three courses of action...[convert, submit, or war]" have something to do with it?<br /><br />With religious adherence to such commands, what hope is there of reconciliation?<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Seeking to ease anger over his perceived criticism of Islam, Benedict met with Ali Bardakoglu, who heads religious affairs in Turkey, warmly grasping hands. Benedict sat nearby as the Muslim cleric defended his religion.<br /><br />"The so-called conviction that the sword is used to expand Islam in the world and growing Islamophobia hurts all Muslims," Bardakoglu said.<br /></blockquote>Rather than condemn fear and criticism of an ideology that commands the Sword to subdue the world under Allah, perhaps Mr. Bardakoglu should work to dissuade his coreligionists from pursuing that ideology.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">The comment appeared to be a reference to Benedict's remarks in a speech in September when he quoted a 14th-century Christian emperor who characterized the Prophet Muhammad's teachings as "evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by thy sword the faith he preached."<br /></blockquote>Why did Manuel II Palaeologus "characterize" the false prophet Mohammed's teachings in this way? It is because he had personally experienced the faithful carrying out those commands against his kingdom and its people. In fact, Constantine XI, Manuel's son, died defending the Great City against the hordes of Allah in 1453. Its fall meant the slaughter (and worse) of many of its inhabitants.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">The Vatican described the cleric's speech as "positive, respectful and non-polemical," applauding what the church sees as efforts for a true dialogue between faiths.<br /></blockquote>Its hard to talk with a blade at your throat.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">On Sunday, more than 25,000 Turks showed up to an anti-Vatican protest in Istanbul, asking the pope to stay at home, but on the streets of Ankara most people went about their usual business and only a tiny protest was held outside the religious affairs office hours before the pope arrived.</blockquote>So much for that "tiny minority of extremists."<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"All feel the same responsibility in this difficult moment in history, let's work together," Benedict said during his flight from Rome to Ankara, where more than 3,000 police and sharpshooters joined a security effort that surpassed even the visit of President Bush two years ago.<br /></blockquote>Islam is the Religion of Tolerance.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"We know that the scope of this trip is dialogue and brotherhood and the commitment for understanding between cultures ... and for reconciliation," he said.<br /></blockquote>There can be no brotherhood between good and evil.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan - in a last-minute change of plans - welcomed the pope at the foot of the plane and described the visit as "very meaningful." Erdogan's political party has Islamic roots, though the government is secular.<br /><br />In his first official act, Benedict visited the mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey, and wrote a message in a guest book calling Turkey "a meeting point of different religions and cultures and a bridge between Asia and Europe."<br /></blockquote>Turkey will soon be formerly secular, since despite the efforts of Ataturk to suppress the expression of Islam and separate it from its Allah-ordained legal and political supremacy, its people are moving ever closer to establishing the rule of Allah.<br /><br />Turkey should fit right in with France in the Eurabian Union.<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...It was his first visit to a Muslim country as pontiff. The original goal of the pope's trip to Turkey was to meet Bartholomew I, leader of the world's 300 million Orthodox Christians. The two major branches of Christianity represented by Bartholomew and Benedict split in 1054 over differences in opinion on the power of the papacy, and the two spiritual heads will meet in an attempt to breach the divide and reunite the churches.<br /><br />Benedict leaves Ankara on Wednesday for Ephesus, where the Virgin Mary is thought to have spent her last years, and will then travel to Istanbul.<br /><br />A closely watched moment of the trip will come Thursday during Benedict's visit to Haghia Sophia, a 1,500-year-old site that was originally a Byzantine church and then turned into a mosque after the Muslim conquest of Istanbul - then known as Constantinople - in 1453. It is now a museum, and Turks would take offense at any religious gestures by the pontiff, who also plans to visit the nearby Blue Mosque.<br /><br />In 1967, Pope Paul VI fell to his knees in prayer, touching off protests by Turks claiming he violated the secular nature of the domed complex. In 1979, Pope John Paul II made no overt religious signs during his visit.</blockquote>Islam cannot tolerate Christians worshiping in lands Muslims have rightfully conquered. And the tragedy of Christian lands being enslaved, raped, and slaughtered by Islam is about to be performed in places whose peoples are not only unaware of the horror to come, they are inviting into their lands the actors who will carry it out.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1165272500658833692006-12-04T14:35:00.000-08:002006-12-05T18:45:53.383-08:00<h3 class="post-title"> Flier Rage, courtesy of the Religion of Perpetual Inflammation and Logical Fallacies<br /></h3><p>Served up with healthy portions of moral equivalence, ad hominem attacks, tu quoque arguments, and half-truths, we have Muslim anger at what appears to be a succinct, decent criticism of those elements of Islamic theology that inspire violence against non-Muslims and apostates in the name of Allah.</p><p>From this article (and a KABC television news report), there is no evidence Pastor Yancey made any factually-inaccurate statements; nor does it appear that he wrote anything hateful or inciting violence against innocents (unless telling the truth is false, hateful, or rage-inducing, which it often is for that "tiny minority of extremists").</p><p>What we have here is a Muslim propagandist (read a "CAIR-quality liar") trying to diffuse criticism and deflect attention from Islam (and its god and prophet's hateful commands) by intimidating into silence someone telling the truth.</p><p>Mr. Omeira offers no substantive (or honest) response to Yancey's statements of fact, just ad hominem attacks and tu quoque arguments. Omeira actually brings up...you guessed it--<i>the Crusades</i>!).</p><p>(Notice in the article's introduction the subtle bias: "interfaith hostilities" actually should read, "Muslims are mad," and "...Muslims say attacks their religion," really should say, "Muslims' religion attacks." Perhaps Mr. Shoaf likes wordplay.)</p><p>From "<a set="yes" href="http://www.avpress.com/n/18/1118_s2.hts">Baptist flier inflames Muslims</a>" (what doesn't inflame Muslims? Perhaps Islam ought to be renamed the "Religion of Perpetual Inflammation"):</p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Interfaith hostilities flared in the Antelope Valley in recent days over the distribution, by a Christian church, of a flier that Muslims say attacks their religion, a message that ties all Muslims to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.<br /><br />The color tract, which bears the logo of First Baptist Church of Quartz Hill, features the red, white and blue Stars and Stripes along with the words: "Remember 9/11: In the name of Allah they brought destruction and death to thousands … in the name of Jesus you can have life eternal, heaven, and salvation through faith in him."<br /><br />The flier goes on to state, "Allah says, 'Sacrifice your life to me, and you can get to heaven.' The God of the Christians and Jews sacrificed His only begotten Son to get you to heaven."<br /><br />The advertising piece concludes by urging the reader to "Repent, Believe, and Receive."<br /><br />Now the matter is on the agenda for discussion by the Antelope Valley Human Relations Task Force at its Monday, Nov. 20, meeting.</blockquote><p>And whom do you think will be taken to task? Those who follow the god and prophet who command the fighting against, subduing and humiliating, and killing of non-Muslims to make the world Islam, or a lone (gasp!) white, male Christian telling the truth?<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Muslims offended...</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>There's a surprise!</p><p>How can a person like this be a "chaplain" (nice appropriation of a formerly perfectly-good English word) involved in any way with prisoners, people already at odds against society?<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Abdul-Wahab Omeira, chaplain of California State Prison Los Angeles County in Lancaster and a leader of the local Muslim community, told the Valley Press he met on Nov. 8 with Audie Yancey, pastor of First Baptist Church of Quartz Hill, to discuss the offense the printed material caused Muslims.</span></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...For his part, Yancey denied that he meant any offense to Muslims and said he distributed the fliers, of which he reported "only 200 went out," "out of love for Muslims."</span><br /></p></blockquote>From what the print and broadcast reports I've seen show, Yancey has said and done nothing for which he should apologize.<br /><br />Next this article's author disgracefully spreads Muslim heresy (even if it is unintentional, being tolerant of evil and spreading its lies makes him culpable for its consequences):<br /><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Muslims consider Mohammed, who founded Islam, to be the last of the Five Prophets through whom Allah addressed humanity.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">The other four were Abraham, Moses, David and Jesus.</span><br /></p></blockquote><p><i>Don't you see? They believe in the same god we do. </i>Nevermind the fact that Mohammed commanded (among other atrocities) offensive warfare to make the world Islam.</p><p>Instead of grilling (and by implication, calling into question the intellectual integrity and intentions of) a well-meaning and rightfully-alarmed citizen, why aren't Norman Shoaf and KABC's Leo Stallworth asking the offended why they follow a god and prophet who declare:</p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">.<span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">..the Messenger of Allah...would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war</span>, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, <span style="font-weight: bold;">invite them to three courses of action</span>. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Invite them to (accept) Islam</span>; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them...<span style="font-weight: bold;">If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya</span>. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. <span style="font-weight: bold;">If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them</span>...'" (Muslim, Book 019, Number 4294).</span></span></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> </blockquote></blockquote>Out of context? What context makes this any more palatable to non-Muslims, any less totalitarian, brutal, and contrary to human Liberty?<br /><br />Islamophobic? Racist? How is citing someone's authoritative texts anything other than...citing someone's authoritative texts?<br /><br />Considering that additional revelations from Allah only make Pastor Yancey look more perceptive, prescient, and patriotic, Mr. Shoaf and Mr. Stallworth more intellectually irresponsible, and Mr. Omeira more deceitful, let us consider these texts:<br /><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"...</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)..." (Qur’an 9:5).</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><br /><br />"</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Fight </span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">the People of the Book</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">,</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> until they pay the Jizya with willing submission</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">,</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> and feel themselves subdued</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">" (Qur'an 9:29).</span><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Say to the Unbelievers</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">, </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">if</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> (now) </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">they desist</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">but if they persist</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them). And </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">fight them on until</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> there is no more tumult or oppression, and </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all that they do" (Qur'an 8:38, 39).</span><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"O ye who believe! </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">fight the unbelievers who gird you about</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">, and let them find firmness in you: and know that Allah is with those who fear Him" (Qur'an 9:123).</span><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Fighting is prescribed for you</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not" (Qur'an 2:216).</span><em style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"></em><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"Allah's Apostle said: '</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...'" (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24).<br /><br /></span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">“Muhammad said, ‘A single endeavor of </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">fighting in Allah’s Cause is better than the world and whatever is in it</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 50).</span><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">“A man came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad in reward.’ He replied, ‘</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">I do not find such a deed</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 44).</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><br /></span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"></span> </blockquote>Which one of those exactly expresses tolerance? Which deserves our acceptance? Which earns its adherents admission into non-Muslim lands?<br /><br />Here is more of why Omeira and other Muslims are so desperate to silence Yancey and others like him. Allah and his (false) prophet (considered the "ideal" man in Islam) on terrorism:<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): 'I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: <span style="font-weight: bold;">I will instill terror</span> into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them'" (Qur'an 8:12).<br /><br />“Allah’s Apostle said, ‘<span style="font-weight: bold;">I have been made victorious with terror</span>. The treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220).</blockquote>Following is another reason why non-Muslims (and Muslims who love their daughters) ought to be unapologetically outraged at--and intolerant of--Islam. Mohammed and Aisha on his raping her, his nine-year-old "wife," and justifying it by saying Allah ordained it (remember, as Islam's "perfect model of conduct," the faithful are to emulate <span style="font-style: italic;">every</span> aspect of Mohammed's life):<br /><blockquote><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">“My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when <i>I was nine years old</i></span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">” (Tabari 9:131).</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><br /><br />"Allah’s Apostle told Aisha [his six-year-old bride and nine-year-old sexual "partner"], ‘You were shown to me twice in my dreams. I beheld a man or angel carrying you in a silken cloth. He said to me, “She is yours, so uncover her.” And behold, it was you. I would then say to myself, “</span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">If this is from Allah, then it must happen</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">”’” (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Number 139-140).</span><br /></blockquote><p>And for those hoping for Moderate Muslims to create a new, tolerant Islam, here is Mohammed on the immutability of his faith (apart from what he himself decides to change, no doubt with only the best of motives):<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"I heard the Prophet saying...'<span style="font-weight: bold;">Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me</span>!'" (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 174).<br /><br />“The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then <span style="font-weight: bold;">I do what is better and expiate my oath</span>'" (Bukhari Volume 7, Book 67, Number 427).</blockquote>Here's Mohammed on freedom of religion:<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, <span style="font-weight: bold;">then kill him</span>" (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57).</blockquote>And on truthfulness:<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"<span style="font-weight: bold;">War is deceit</span>" (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 268).</blockquote>Finally, here is why what the false prophet says matters so much to Muslims, straight from Allah (by way of Mohammed, of course--how convenient!):<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah" (Qur'an 33:21).</blockquote><p>Now back to the further undermining of Western Civilization by Islam's apologists and our own Useful Idiots:<br /></p><blockquote><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...Yancey, who served as a drill sergeant and saw battle in Vietnam during a 20-year Marine career, said he sends out such tracts each month as an outreach to the community. He confirmed that the tract in question was distributed for the month of September.</p><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Yancey told the Valley Press he had been in the process of writing a letter of clarification and apology that he hoped would be published in the Valley Press for the community to read. He said he had been reading the Quran so that he could "get it straight from the Quran what Mohammed said."<br /></p><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"But Mr. Omeira forced the issue," Yancey said, by publicizing Muslim offense at the September tract, and Yancey subsequently spoke with a Valley Press reporter to clarify his church's position.</p><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"I'm not here to mock you or put you down," Omeira said he told Yancey during their meeting. "My intent is not to debate."</p><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"I am here to tell you what you did was wrong."</p><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"</span><b style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">You are morally responsible for any hate crime against my community, and for making our kids hate each other</b><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">," Omeira said....</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>In other words: "Don't make yourself aware of what motivates the enemy, but if you do, you'd better keep it to yourself!"</p><p>What a liar! Yancey tells the truth about Omeira's co-religionists murdering for Allah, and he's morally responsible?</p><p>It is Allah who teaches to hate the Infidel. If those targeted by the Religion of Moral Equivalence, Subtle Propaganda, and Logical Fallacies react with a natural (and healthy) aversion to such tyranny, whose fault is that, the truth-teller's, or the god and prophet who command such evil?</p><p>Telling the truth is not a hate crime. Neither is self-defense against a ruthless and deceptive foe.<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"When the terrorists come, they won't care what religion we are. They want to kill us all."</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>Or convert us. Or subdue us. Or enslave us.</p><p>Here comes one of Islam's favorite subtle deceptions (how Clintonian of him!):<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...Of the flier's assertion that "In the name of Allah they brought destruction and death to thousands," Omeira said he asked Yancey, "Did the terrorists actually say this?"</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>Of course, the terrorists did not actually say, "In the name of...they...," but their actions are consistent with Allah's commands (<span style="font-style: italic;">which is what "in the name of" means!</span>) for offensive warfare as found in Islam's "sacred" texts. And the article's author let's this little trick go unchallenged!</p><p>Here comes the implication of dishonesty on the part of the pastor (perhaps the author is practicing for when he gets that call from the New York Times or some other pro-American, pro-Western beacon of truth.)<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>He said he gave Yancey a copy of the Quran - <i>the one the Baptist pastor said he afterward took up reading</i> - and challenged him, "If you can find that statement in the Quran, <b>I will go and admit it to the whole community</b>."</p></blockquote><p>What Omeira won't admit to ignorant, intellectually-lazy, politically correct Americans is the truth--until it is too late.<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>The Quran never instructs believers to fight and kill, Omeira said, except in self-defense.</p></blockquote><p>Of course, it doesn't say, "fight and kill." It does say, "fight," and it does say, "kill" (and "execute," "crucifixion," "put out the eyes," and "...kill the unbelievers wherever you find them").</p><p>Qur'an does allow (and then later, require) fighting in self-defense. Unfortunately for Mr. Omeira (and the victims of Mohammed's malevolence throughout history around the world), the Prophet from Hell also requires offensive warfare to establish the rule of Allah over all Mankind.<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>Yancey said he had read through the Quran's first three suras (chapters) and scanned the rest of Islam's holy book.</p><p>"The Quran forbids Mr. Omeira from associating with non-Muslims," Yancey said. "According to the Quran, he is not practicing Islam.</p><p>"The Quran also tells Muslims to 'fight in the way of Allah,' and that if you die while fighting, you are guaranteed to go to heaven.</p><p>"I'm not sure what the Quran promises to those who don't fight - whether they go to heaven or not."</p><p>Yancey said the tract's statement, "In the name of Allah they brought destruction and death to thousands," referred to the 9-11 terrorists.</p><p>He admitted that an extensive search of the Internet did not produce corroboration for the statement, but asserted that he and an assistant had seen the statement.</p></blockquote><p>Of course they were fulfilling their duty to Allah, as his revelations (above) require. Omeira's challenge is merely a distraction, a straw man.<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>...According to Omeira, Yancey told him, "I want Muslims to see that Jesus Christ died for their sins, and that they can have eternal life."</p><p>Omeira said he told Yancey that if the pastor wanted to debate, they should do so in public.</p></blockquote><p>Which would only give someone skilled in deception for Allah to apparently refute the claims of someone beginning to educate himself on Islam (a job our political, academic, and media elites should have been doing since at least 9/11).</p><p>Here comes some false moral equivalence from the practitioner of the Religion of Truth:</p><blockquote><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">He reported that Yancey declined an invitation to speak to the Muslim community at the local mosque by saying, "I'm not allowed to do that. My book (the Bible) doesn't allow me to."</p><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"</span><b style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">That's what bin Laden says</b><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">," Omeira replied, "that 'we can't dialogue.' "</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>Of course, Yancey has planned and carried out flying planes into buildings in the name of Christ.</p><p>Actually, bin Laden cites the command of Allah and the example of his messenger, as I am sure Omeira knows.</p><p>Neither does Omeira want dialogue, if by "dialogue" we mean a truthful examination of the facts. All he wants is larger forum in which to twist, misrepresent, and obfuscate in order to deceive the Islam-illiterate members of the community and media.<br /></p><p>Next are two lies: First, that Islamic terrorism is a "perversion" of Islam (as noted above from Mohammed's own words, he and his god see terrorism as an effective means to our end); and second, the tu quoque argument that says that a millennium-old action <span style="font-weight: bold;">in defense of other Christians</span>--<i>after centuries of Muslim murder, mayhem, and misanthropy against them</i>--is in some way equivalent to Jihad. And both Shoaf and Stallworth appear to swallow that whole:<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>"I am not responsible for how someone misused Islam," Omeira said, "any more than I can blame Christians as a whole for the violence that took place during the Crusades, or the Spanish Inquisition, or the rapes of Muslim women and killings of Muslims during the conflict in Bosnia. These crimes were committed by individuals."</p></blockquote><p>(How dare Omeira bring up Bosnia. Islam has been slaughtering, raping, and enslaving Christians there for centuries, most recently with the aid of the First Muslim President, Bill Clinton.)</p><p>In the case of Islamic terrorism (<i>which is the point</i>!), these "committed individuals" are merely obeying their god and role model.<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>God can bring himself to individual humans in whatever way God chooses, Omeira said.</p></blockquote><p>And if that happens to be through a murderous, thieving, lying, heretical pedophile, all the better!</p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>"I have used the metaphor of a dart board," Omeira said. "God is the bullseye - but any stripe can get you there."</p></blockquote><p>Not according to Allah. Not according to Christ. But, since so many Americans believe in nothing (or don't know what they believe) this sort of appeal to ambiguity probably seems quite tolerant of him.</p><p>And of course, the implication is, "We are the same. Don't criticize us. What are you, racist?"<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Two faiths vary</span></p></blockquote><p>That's an understatement! For those who claim the god of Islam is the God of the Bible, Allah doesn't think so:<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"<span style="font-weight: bold;">In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary</span>. Say: "Who then hath the least power against Allah, <span style="font-weight: bold;">if His will were to destroy Christ</span> the son of Mary, his mother, and all every - one that is on the earth? For to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and<br />all that is between. He createth what He pleaseth. For Allah hath power over all things" (Qur'an 5:17).<br /><br />"<span style="font-weight: bold;">They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three in a Trinity</span>: for there is no god except One Allah. If they desist not from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them" (Qur'an 5:73).<br /><br />"The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Christians call Christ the son of Allah</span>. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Allah's curse be on them</span>: <span style="font-weight: bold;">how they are deluded away from the Truth</span>" (Qur'an 9:30)!</blockquote>Continuing with the article:<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>"I have Muslim friends who I love very much," Yancey told the Valley Press. "The tract explains the difference between two religions. Of course I was trying to put my religion in the best light.</p></blockquote><p>It deserves to be in the best light. Expose Islam to the light and what you get is this sort of personal attack and deception in response.<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"The flier was attacking the people it speaks about - the terrorists," he said, pointing to the flier.</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>Addressing the facts is what Omeira wants to avoid at all costs.<br /></p><blockquote><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Omeira said Yancey asked him why "you people," referring to Muslims, aren't doing something about terror.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"I asked him if he had attended the meeting I put together after the London terror bombings," Omeira said.</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>Why would anyone want to associate with the adherents of a faith that had just killed and maimed innocents?<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>Omeira said he also has helped sponsor the Antelope Valley's annual 9-11 memorial service as well as an interfaith service for the National Day of Prayer.</p></blockquote><p>Ecumenism sports no <i>temporal</i> danger--unless one of those faiths wants to eat the others.</p><p>Here come <i>four</i> (!) ad hominem attacks attempting to shame the pastor into silence, again repeated dutifully by Mr. Shoaf:<br /></p><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><p>"What you are doing is <b>un-American</b>," Omeira said he told Yancey.</p><p>"<b>You are dividing us</b>. This country means a lot to us, and we must protect it.<span style="font-weight: bold;"> W</span><b>hat you are doing is hurtful to our community</b>.</p><p>"Our strength is in our diversity and plurality," the chaplain said of the United States.</p><p>"(Yancey) thinks <b>he has the monopoly on righteousness</b>," Omeira said.</p></blockquote><p>The nerve of that Infidel, Yancey! Doesn't he know he's supposed to uncritically and enthusiastically accept and endorse the dominion of Allah over America?<br /></p><p>(And by "community," is Mr. Omeira referring to all, including non-Muslims, or does he mean only the Ummah?)<br /></p><blockquote><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">...Omeira said he took the issue up with the Human Relations Task Force only after an apology was not immediately forthcoming from Yancey.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"I was coming to him in love," Omeira said.</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>Love of what? Not the truth. More Taqiyyaspeak for the naive and gullible among his audience.<br /></p><blockquote><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">"He said he had been terrorized by a phone call he had received and that I should talk to his attorney general."</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>This article doesn't note it, but another report said that Yancey and his wife felt forced to give up protection of their grandchildren out of fear for their safety. And that is just a hint of a shadow of a wisp of a suggestion of a taste of what non-Muslims have experienced at the hands of Allah over the centuries.<br /></p><blockquote><p style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Omeira said the phone call to which Yancey referred had come from Bob Forshay, a member of the Human Relations Task Force.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Omeira said members of the local Muslim community received hate mail after the flier appeared....</span><br /></p></blockquote><p>No decent person wants innocent Muslims to suffer.</p><p>Those Muslims who truly reject forever the effort (including, but not limited to, Jihad) to make the world Islam and implement Shari'ah, who support permanently equal rights for non-Muslims and women under the United States Constitution, and who actually do abhor the command of Allah and the perversion of Mohammed--they should encourage and support Pastor Yancey and others like him seeking to bring to light the temporal and eternal danger posed by Islam, and they should be challenging and exposing and deporting those advocate, support, or carry out actions against the well-being of the United States.</p>Our Constitution is a safeguard against the infringement of American Liberty, not a shackle to prevent our self-defense.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1164435551566794122006-11-24T22:18:00.000-08:002006-12-01T11:31:49.083-08:00<strong>Why is Tampa's Fox 13 Marching for CAIR?</strong><br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lGPZEfd8-u0" width="225" height="150" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed><br /><br />The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGPZEfd8-u0">above</a> is just one example of local <a href="http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/">Tampa Bay Area Channel 13</a>, now the local Fox affiliate, showing extreme bias against anyone willing to attack Islamic beliefs, in this case Congresswoman Ginny Brown-Waite. This is the piece of MSM trash that will be analyzed bit by bit tonight. This outrageous bit of local journalism also shows the limitless extremes that the station will go to, particularly reporter Craig Patrick, to smear people like Ms. Brown-Waite, even using the absurd tactic of inserting clips of a KKK rally and a historical Nazi clip into the piece.<br /><br />Patrick also seems to, along with his colleagues, Anchors John Wilson and Kathy Fountain, need little prompting to praise and feature CAIR-Florida's Ahmed Bedier. These individuals and the news team at Fox 13 are obviously either suffering from an overdose of political correctness, or are getting something out of their obvious brown-nosing to the local Muslim community. There is simply no reason for a news station anywhere to give airtime to some of the absurd claims that Mr. Bedier has tried to champion, and which he has conveniently uploaded to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=bedier">YouTube</a> for the world to see.<br /><br />Most would ignore some of these issues, and certainly wouldn't feature Mr. Bedier in so many interviews. Yet other local affiliates also feature Bedier, such as Channels 8 and 9, Channel 9 even featuring Bedier for their segment "On the Soapbox". However, of Bedier's 78 uploaded videos on YouTube, (no joke) 13 are from appearances on Fox 13, most with the same on-air "talent" appearing, usually not to do any hardball type of interview, but rather to offer segways for his manipulative statements.<br /><br />I offer this not as a conclusive statement, but simply as an opportunity for Channel 13 to prove me wrong, and for CAIR to publicly state that they have made no contributions to media outlets in this country. This information can be obtained with an investigation, which I hope this all comes to, but for now I think the evidence as shown in the video above proves either bias based on the views of the staff of Fox 13, which is appalling as the report clearly smears a member of Congress in a rather dangerous way, or that there must be something going on under the table. I do not think that CAIR is above such a move, though I have no evidence in this case. Who knows, perhaps the news team and Bedier are just great golfing friends. There is something amiss here though, and if you cannot see it then you are either blind, deaf and dumb, or a subscriber to CAIR's newsletter.<br /><br />First, this clip, point by point.....<br /><br />Read it all at <a href="http://whatwouldcharlesmarteldotm.blogspot.com/2006/11/why-is-tampas-station-fox13-marching.html">WWCMD?</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1164399155959336442006-11-24T12:12:00.000-08:002006-11-24T12:12:35.983-08:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/1600/2636/Nuns-Taqiyya2.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/320/438223/Nuns-Taqiyya2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />I felt like captioning this one finally; CAIR's Parvez Ahmed, Omar Ahmad and Dougie "Ibrahim" Hooper in stunning new roles. OK, the pic is old, but I used one of my only Photoshop talents today and added some type to it, and it was about time.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1164258962320281462006-11-22T21:14:00.000-08:002006-11-22T21:16:02.366-08:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/1600/15117/TIME%3APope.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/1275/2133/320/808728/TIME%3APope.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /> <br /><strong> TIME Magazine's Fun New Coveer Story (excerpts from a dissection and rant)</strong><br />OK, I really got on a roll dissecting this TIME Magazine article, and certainly hope that I don't get anymore copies for free. Great cannon fodder, not good for the nerves particularly. But this "history" timeline was too good not to share and rant for a while on:<br /><br /><br />"The topic is extraordinarily fraught. There are, after all, a billion or so nonviolent Muslims on the globe, the Roman Catholic Church's own record in the religious-mayhem department is hardly pristine, and even the most naive of observers understands that the Vicar of Christ might harbor an institutional prejudice against one of Christianity's main global competitors."<br /><br />That's right, it is all about that "nonviolent" percentage. Yeah, I keep picturing two bomb laden guys in Luke Skywalker's Landspeeder with only Obi-Wan's Jedi mind trick able to trick anyone into thinking "These are not the terrorists you are looking for, these are PEACEFUL MUSLIMS. We can go about our business". Just think, the media don't even have Jedi powers and they've been able to get people to parrot that garbage for five years while security officers search the underwear of old white ladies from rural Tennessee at airports. Please. And never forget to throw in the history of the Roman Catholic Church, which when discussing events as early as the Crusades, was actually the ancestral Church of all of our forbears if we are of Christian European heritage, whatever our beliefs now. Yes, unless one is adressing certain Orthodox Churches and sects, such as some that the Pope is in fact going to Turkey to visit, then discussing the Roman Catholic Church as just one piece of the larger picture is not accurate. And I seriously doubt that the Vatican or any other Christian lay or professional emissaries regard Islam as merely "one of Christianity's main global competitors".<br /><br />(....)<br /><br />The timeline in question is simply pathetic. It is biased, it is poorly worded (to show perhaps the bias?), it skips several centuries, and is careful in its treatment of the beginning of Islam. This bothers me, all of it. The other thing that bothers me is that if you are going to write a "History of Interaction", you should add more than a handful of questionable views of historical fact. Maybe this is why I could not find this in the online version, only the print copy. Therefore, let me reproduce it for you here:<br /><br />CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM: A HISTORY OF INTERACTION<br /><br />589-632 Koran revealed to Muhammad; it shares stories with Judeo-Christian texts<br /><br />711-718 Arabs conquer Spain, which becomes center of commerce and culture<br /><br />1096-1291 Christian Europe launches the Crusades against Islam<br /><br />1453 Ottoman Turks take Constantinople, capital of Orthodox Christianity<br /><br />1492 King Ferdinand drives the Moors from Spain and next expels the Jews<br /><br />1683 The Ottoman siege of Vienna fails, marking the end of its Islamic expansion<br /><br />1965 The Vatican issues Nostra Aetate, which calls for interfaith discussion<br /><br />2001 Pope John Paul II is first Pontiff to visit a mosque, in Damascus, Syria<br /><br />Sept. 2006 Pope Benedict XVI links Islam to violence, igniting debate and protest<br /><br />And that's it. That's the history of interaction. Never mind that it is merely belief that the Koran was "revealed" to Muhammad, a distinction usually not afforded to Christians or Jews, but instead given the common journalistic disclaimer "What Jews/Christians believe to be an event in their Faith in which.....". Note the conquest of Spain, simply put, but pleasantly wrapped up by the odd mention of the myth that it became a "center of commerce and culture" that somehow implies peace for the conquered. Then, oh heavens to Betsy, Christian Europe launches those darned Crusades! Why not mention the "interaction" that led to the call for the Crusades in the first place? Wouldn't want to anger guest writer Tariq Ramadan I suppose....<br />After some time of "European Christians" doing their Crusading against apparently placid Muslims, they somehow take Constantinople. No mention of how Turks come into Islam, nor of any Muslim activities that may have "ignited debate and protest" on the part of any non-Muslims. Skip to La Reqonquista, which was not glorious but involved "driving out", as of so much cattle. And note that the rotten Christian King also "next expels the Jews". Can't let that one slip, unlike the wholesale slaughter of the Jews of Granada in 1066. Am I being nit-picky? Pardon me, TIME. Skip quite a bit again to 1683, never mention the details of the Siege of Vienna, leave readers wondering just how anyone in Europe could have been hostile to the Ottomans while they've had a major city under siege and their failure brings "Islamic expansion to an end". <br /><br />Please read the <a href="http://whatwouldcharlesmarteldotm.blogspot.com/2006/11/time-magazine-presents-another.html">rest</a>.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163327983134151092006-11-12T02:38:00.000-08:002006-11-13T12:20:12.526-08:00<span style="font-weight: bold;">Fox obfuscates for jihad</span><br /><br />The text of an e-mail sent to Tampa Bay's Fox television station in response to their piece bullying a responsible, aware, and courageous member of Congress (how rare are these kinds of politicians at any level of government!), Ginny Brown-Waite:<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Judging from your segment on Congresswoman Brown-Waite's refusal to condemn the Hogans, it seems not unreasonable to assume that if you had covered World War II after Pearl Harbor you would have poked and prodded FDR about other fascists besides the Nazis ("Why are you such a Germanophobe"?); you would have quizzed him about other monarchies (Why must you dwell on Imperial Japan?), and you would have uncritically broadcast blurbs from Nazi propagandists denying the Holocaust.<br /><br />The Hogans and Brown-Waite are correct: Islam's authoritative texts (Qur'an, Sira, and Hadith) require the fighting against, subduing and humiliating, and killing of non-Muslims to make the world Islam.<br /><br />Muslim apologists for Jihad seeking to deceive naive Western Infidels try to discredit and demonize those critical of their god and prophet as "Islamophobes," "racist," or "extreme." Other times, they accuse them of taking Islamic "holy" texts "out of context."<br /><br />Such accusations are shown to be only pitiful, deceptive, and false ad hominem attacks when Allah and his apostle are allowed to speak for themselves.<br /><br />Rather than mock a responsible public servant and swallow whole the jihadist propaganda fed to you by Ahmed Bedier, why don't you ask him why he worships a god and follows a prophet who state:<br /><blockquote>"...fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)..." (Qur’an 9:5).<br /><br />"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued" (Qur'an 9:29).<br /><br />"...fight them [Unbelievers] on until...there prevail...faith in Allah altogether and everywhere..." (Qur'an 8:38, 39).<br /><br />"Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not" (Qur'an 2:216).<br /><br />"Allah's Apostle said: 'I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle...'" (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24).<br /><br />“Muhammad said, ‘A single endeavor of fighting in Allah’s Cause is better than the world and whatever is in it’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 50).<br /><br />“A man came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad in reward.’ He replied, ‘I do not find such a deed’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 44).<br /><br />"Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): 'I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them'" (Qur'an 8:12).<br /><br />"Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror. The treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand’” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220).<br /><br />"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him" (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57).<br /><br />"War is deceit" (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 268).<br /><br />"Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah" (Qur'an 33:21).</blockquote>And a last bit on Mohammed's raping of his nine-year-old "wife" and justifying it by saying Allah ordained it:<br /><blockquote>“My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old” (Tabari 9:131).<br /><br />“Allah’s Apostle told Aisha [his six-year-old bride and nine-year-old sexual "partner"], ‘You were shown to me twice in my dreams. I beheld a man or angel carrying you in a silken cloth. He said to me, “She is yours, so uncover her.” And behold, it was you. I would then say to myself, “If this is from Allah, then it must happen”’” (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Number 139-140).</blockquote>Again, rather than mock Americans defending their Liberty, expose the corruption and/or ignorance of Western dhimmis like Governor Bush and the deception and malice of Muslim apologists like Ahmed Bedier. </blockquote>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163272694865269212006-11-11T11:14:00.000-08:002006-11-11T11:18:14.870-08:00<span style="font-weight: bold;">When blindness leads otherwise smart people to draw false conclusions</span><br /><br /><a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015762.php">In a post at the excellent Power Line</a>, the West's fundamental inability (or unwillingness) to publicly admit and address the fact that the will of Allah and his false prophet--as revealed in Qur'an and Sunnah--inspires and sustains the global jihad against us (and all other non-Muslims) raises its ugly, decapitated head. Paul writes:<br /><blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">In my view, Iraqi participation in elections, sometimes at great personal risk, <span style="font-weight: bold;">goes a long way towards answering those who say there's something in the Iraqi (or Arab) DNA that is incompatible with the administration's democracy project</span>. Unfortunately, though, more was required of the Iraqi peoople than just voting. The situation called on them to <span style="font-weight: bold;">elect leaders who would work in good faith for national reconciliation</span>, rather than tilting substantially in the direction of one sectarian faction. The Iraqis failed to do this when <span style="font-weight: bold;">they voted in the Shia-militia-friendly Malacki government</span>, thereby making it difficult, if not impossible, for the U.S. to work with the current government to curb sectarian violence.<br /><br />The Iraqis, of course, are not the first people to make <span style="font-weight: bold;">a very bad decision</span> at the polls. The fact that they did so is not necessarily evidence of some national 'genetic' flaw, much less a demonstration that <span style="font-weight: bold;">democracy can't work in the Middle East</span>. It just means that <span style="font-weight: bold;">the Iraqi people did less than what a difficult situation required</span>, and that <span style="font-weight: bold;">we must face up to and deal with the consequences</span>. </blockquote>This analysis--as too that of the President and his administration, Old Media, and just about every other Infidel too unaware (how can one be unaware now over five years out from 9/11?) or too timid to admit it--<span style="font-style: italic;">fails to account for the role of Islam</span>. It looks at the Global Jihad through the prism of its own belief system (or lack of one) and expects observant Muslims to think, vote, and act as Westerners would. This is naive and foolish, for the Religion of Peace is <span style="font-style: italic;">the</span> defining factor in all calculations involving the Muslim world and our Global War of Self-Defense Against Allah, and it is diametrically opposed to the values and beliefs foundational to Western Civilization.<br /><br />(A sad irony perpetuated by those who deny that we are engaged in a "clash of civilizations" is that Islam is fully exploiting to Allah's advantage the West's political, religious, legal, and moral weaknesses, but we do nothing to resist its advance. The West could utterly devastate any portion of the Ummah it wishes (in whole or in part), but jihadists, their sympathetic co-religionists, and their Useful Idiots in the West have intimidated and deceived us so thoroughly that one cannot even question Islam. So craven are we that our own politicians not only defend or deny in the public discourse the tyranny of Allah, they introduce legislation to impose it upon us.)<br /><br />The fundamental issue on which American success in Iraq has always hinged is to what degree the Iraqi people embrace the will of Allah. The more devout, faithful, and religious its people, the less likely will it be that Iraq will achieve true Liberty and equality of rights for all its citizens (including religious minorities and women), and the greater the likelihood that its people will continue to contribute to jihad against us.<br /><br />In effect, <span style="font-style: italic;">America and its friends are making our success in Iraq dependent upon the apostasy of its Muslims</span>.<br /><br />Jihad in Iraq is not the result of innate, unavoidable genetic factors, nor is it due to matters of nationalism. It is due to the belief system of too significant a percentage of the Muslim people: <span style="font-style: italic;">Islam</span>.<br /><br />Democracy means that the people vote for the government they desire. Iraqis voted for a tall glass of Shari'ah with a Shia twist (that's why fourteen year-old Christian boys are being beheaded at work). Clearly, democracy is working in Iraq, just not the way Infidels would prefer it.<br /><br />How can we expect the Iraqi people vote for leaders who will work "in good faith" toward "reconciliation," when the nation is nearly entirely Muslim (non-Muslims are suffering more and more since Saddam was removed), and its people are divided along the ancient, historical, and religious lines of Shia versus Sunni? War, persecution, and humiliation is what they do to each other.<br /><br />Neither can one be surprised when a nation that is majority-Shia vote for...a Shia! And since Allah and his apostle require that every able-bodied Muslim engage in jihad against the Infidel and Apostate to make the world Islam, it should not come as a shock that these Shia would be militia-friendly.<br /><br />Iraq's decision at the polls is only "very bad" if you are non-Muslim or Sunni. For those who voted, they got what they wanted (or at least a step closer toward it, perhaps the establishment of an Iran/Shia-based caliphate).<br /><br />Neither did the Iraqis "do less than what a difficult situation required," they did what the law allowed and their ideology demanded. They used the Western imposition of the democratic process to advance the establishment of Shari'ah, the rule of Islam.<br /><br />Now the West must "face up to and deal with the consequences" of our failure to understand and address the source and sustenance of Muslim terrorism: the will of Allah and his messenger. It is they who require the fighting against, subduing and humiliating, and killing of non-Muslims to make the world Islam.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163272430727416312006-11-11T11:11:00.000-08:002006-11-11T11:19:00.303-08:00<span style="font-weight: bold;">Killing two fallacies with one poll</span><br /><br />From <a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015687.php">Power Line</a>:<blockquote style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"> Thomas asks Secretary Rice what evidence she has that the denizens of such an independent state would give up the dream that actually seems to drive them -- the dream of eliminating Israel:<br /><blockquote> SECRETARY RICE: Well, you can look at any opinion poll in the Palestinian territories and 70 percent of the people will say they're perfectly ready to live side by side with Israel because they just want to live in peace. And when it comes right down to it, yeah, there are plenty of extremists in the Palestinian territories who are not going to be easily dealt with. They have to be dealt with — Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in the Palestinian territories — they're terrorists and they have to be dealt with as terrorists.<br /><br />But the great majority of Palestinian people — this is — I've been with these people. The great majority of people, they just want a better life. This is an educated population. I mean, they have a kind of culture of education and a culture of civil society. I just don't believe mothers want their children to grow up to be suicide bombers. I think the mothers want their children to grow up to go to university. And if you can create the right conditions, that's what people are going to do.<br /><br /> QUESTION: Do you think this or do you know this?<br /><br /> SECRETARY RICE: Well, I think I know it.<br /><br /> QUESTION: You think you know it?<br /><br /> SECRETARY RICE: I think I know it. </blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;">I'd like to see the</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">poll </span>to which Secretary Rice is referring. I don't recall one with results as described. But what are we to make of the broader issue? I read Secretary Rice's responses as suggesting that she knows, or thinks she knows, she's peddling tripe.</blockquote>That poll would be their last election, in which the "Palestianians" voted for a terrorist group sworn to Israel's destruction.<br /><br />This fact kills two falsehoods: First, that "Palestinians" are a noble people desiring freedom and peaceful coexistence with Israel, and second, that democracy will benefit the Infidel when instituted among a people enslaved by Islam.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163272177814167822006-11-11T11:08:00.000-08:002006-11-11T11:09:37.816-08:00<span style="font-weight: bold;">Christian Liberty versus the tyranny of Allah</span><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7045/463/1600/Multiculturalism.jpg"><img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7045/463/400/Multiculturalism.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Some cultures <span style="font-style: italic;">are </span>better than others.<br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163272112454712362006-11-11T11:06:00.000-08:002006-11-11T11:08:32.456-08:00<span style="font-weight: bold;">A variant on a decidedly tragic historical theme</span><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7045/463/1600/Crusade%20%28people%29.jpg"><img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7045/463/400/Crusade%20%28people%29.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Sticks and stones may break my bones,<br />and sometimes words are a very clear indicator of what is to come.<br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163271987823929692006-11-11T11:05:00.000-08:002006-11-11T11:06:27.826-08:00<div style="text-align: center;"><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">A little historical irony</span><br /></div><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7045/463/1600/Crusade%20%28attacks%29.5.jpg"><img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7045/463/400/Crusade%20%28attacks%29.3.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><br />The more things change, the more they stay the same.<br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1163271848781938102006-11-11T11:02:00.000-08:002007-03-25T18:48:57.750-07:00<p style="font-weight: bold;">The undeniable, inexplicable, and stubborn ignorance of Hugh Hewitt<br /></p><p>On matters of traditional national politics, there are few commentators as knowledgeable or perceptive as Hugh Hewitt.</p> <p>On the subject of Islam and the threat it poses to free people everywhere, there are few more (undoubtedly innocently) obtuse.</p> <p><strong>The Moderate Muslim</strong></p> <p><span style="font-style: italic;">There are Apostate Muslims, but Islam itself is not moderate.</span> That's a variation of the insightful and succinct, "There are moderate Muslims, but Islam itself is not moderate."</p> <p>Besides the untenable "Islamism has nothing to do with Islam," Hugh persists in attempting to (mis-) define the Religion of Peace in terms of those Muslims who (allegedly) reject forever offensive warfare against the Infidel and Apostate to make the world Islam.</p> <p>"<span style="font-style: italic;">Alleged</span>," for how can one have Islam without Allah and his Qur'an? Without Mohammed words and deeds? A true Muslim must obey Allah and his apostle who command the fighting against, subduing and humiliating, and killing of non-Muslims.</p> <p><strong>Establishing the Facts</strong></p> <p>Following are questions to which Hugh has never provided me the answers. These are questions he must avoid answering, for--as he delights in demonstrating with hostile callers to his radio program--establishing basic facts lead inextricably to certain conclusions. To avoid admitting these truths Hugh seems willing to sacrifice any amount of his intellectual integrity and moral courage:</p> <blockquote> <p>1. Is Qur'an the perfect word of Allah?</p> <p>2. Are all Allah's commands (that he has not abrogated) in Qur'an to be obeyed by faithful Muslims?</p> <p>3. Are the words and example of Mohammed (Sira and Hadith) to be emulated by faithful Muslims (as their resources and circumstances allow)? </p> <p>4. Does Allah command the faithful Muslim to "...kill the unbelievers wherever you find them"?</p> <p>Does Allah require the faithful Muslim to "Fight...until all religion is for Allah"?</p> <p>Did Allah command faithful Muslims to "Fight...the People of the Book until they feel themselves subdued and pay the jizya"? </p> <p>5. Did Mohammed state that he had been ordered to "fight until all confess there is no god but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet"? </p> <p>6. Did Mohammed say that no work is like Jihad? </p> <p>7. Did Mohammed say that he had "been made victorious with terror"? </p> <p>8. Did Mohammed say, "If anyone changes his religion, then kill him"? </p> <p>9. Did Mohammed indulge his "marital impulse" with a <em>nine-year-old child</em> (marrying her when she was <em>six</em> and he in his <em>fifties</em>)?</p> <p>Did he not attribute his raping this child (his favorite wife) to Allah by saying, "If this is from Allah, then it must happen"? </p> <p>10. Have Muslims warred against humanity to make the world Islam (again, as their resources and will have allowed) for nearly fourteen centuries?</p></blockquote> <p>The answer to all these questions is, regrettably and tragically, "yes." These are unalterable facts of history, despite what deceitful apologists and gullible, ignorant infidels and apostates might say to the contrary.</p> <p>Denying that the violence of Qur'an, Sira, and Hadith inspire and sustain jihad is like denying Hitler's ideology motivated the Holocaust. It is absurd.</p> <p><strong>That "<em>Tiny</em> Minority of Extremists"</strong></p> <p><em>You keep using that word ("tiny"). I do not think it means what you think it means.</em></p> <p>How blind (or craven) must one be at this stage of the West's submission to Islam's bloody intimidation not only to deny still the commands of Allah and his false prophet for offensive warfare against the Infidel, but to persist in the absurdity that the jihad ideology receives support from only a "tiny minority of extremists"?</p> <p>It is becoming increasingly difficult to avoid noticing that wherever Muslims protest in any significant (or insignificant) numbers, they do not protest against the "hijackers" of their religion, nor do they protest in favor of Liberty or human rights. Rather, they protest in favor of beheading, burning, and burying anyone who dares to point out Allah and his prophet from Hell's delight in evil, even when that involves merely citing <em>their own "sacred" texts</em>.<br /></p> <p>Recent opinion polls in the UK show growing support among Muslims for violence against their hosts (some even carry it out!). All over Europe, "youths" burn and break (and worse) Infidel personal property (and persons). In Pakistan, not only do you have nearly total (90%) lust for Infidel and Apostate blood, but you've got the government's intelligence agency aiding the jihadists! Indonesia's population is admitting more openly its support for holy war. One election after another within Dar al-Islam brings to its "perverters" of the "great world religion" ever-increasing political power. What of the Philippines? Somalia? Nigeria? Sudan?<br /></p> <p>Even if only one percent of the world's Muslims would actually engage in jihad (<em></em>one percent of 1.2 billion is <em>12 million</em>!), a majority of the ummah still support it financially, logistically, emotionally, and spiritually. And nearly all support the subjugation of the Infidel under Shari'ah.</p><p>They must, because <em>their god and prophet require it</em>.</p><span style="font-weight: bold;">In Conclusion</span><br /><p>The challenge facing the West is not in strength of arms, but in strength of will and clarity of mind. If we lack the will or ability to admit against what we fight--the god that commands, "...kill the unbelievers wherever you find them"--how can we possibly deal effectively with its ideology of hate and the threat posed by its adherents?</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1162999669419284822006-11-08T07:27:00.000-08:002006-11-14T20:19:58.376-08:00<strong> Pim Fortuyn's Prediction </strong><br /><br />Whatever your thoughts on the elections yesterday in the US, always remember that things can go very differently. Long one of my favorite video clips of Pim Fortuyn, I was surprised to find it referenced in an <a href="http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=wilders110106%2Ehtm">article</a> linked on <a href="www.thereligionofpeace.com">TROP</a> today. The article, "Sleepwalking Dutch Lulled Into Complacency On Terrorism", written by Beila Rabinowitz of MilitantIslamMonitor.org, deals mainly with the current political situation as seen through the lens of past assaults and threats, does mention the predictions of both Theo van Gogh and Pim Fortuyn. <br /><br />Theo van Gogh had said before Pim's assasination:<br /><br />"I suspect Fortuyn will be the first in a line of politically incorrect heretics to be eliminated. This is what our multicultural society has brought us: a climate of intimidation in which all sorts of goat fuckers can issue their threats freely."<br /><br />(goat fuckers being a joke name used by van Gogh for the Muslims in his country)<br /><br />Also there is the rather spotty translation of Fortuyn's comments from an appearance on the Dutch TV program "Jensen" just a few months before he was murdered, but it's no less spotty than my own translation:<br /><br />Presciently, Fortuyn's predicted his assassination. In an interview which can be seen on You Tube [Pim Fortuyn Als mij wat gebeurt, "If something happens to me] the prime ministerial candidate declared:<br /><br />"If you see what I get in the mail from time to time - I mean all the threats - it wouldn't make you cheerful. And the Dutch government - I find that a bloody shame, [it] helps to create a climate, the demonizing of me as a person. And if something should happens to me soon, and I am happy you are giving me the opportunity - and if something happens to me soon, then they are partly responsible. And they cant remove their hands from responsibility and say but it wasn't me who committed the attack. You have created the climate. And that has to stop."<br /><br />Not included in this is the wry joke that Fortuyn makes asking if anyone has anymore pies to throw, referring to the infamous incident (which can also be seen on YouTube in a Dutch news report <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uocDk3Ydhkg">here</a>) in which he was pied by leftist radicals with pies containing urine and feces, a comment that shows his immense charm and wit even without translation.<br /><br /><object width="225" height="150"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vbcuyUVb-nY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vbcuyUVb-nY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="225" height="150"></embed></object><br /><br />I am just happy to see this linked, as the user who posted this video is one of my favorite Fortuynist cohorts (YouTube user "problemsolver71"). I am also very happy that after our initial posting of Pim videos there has been a veritable avalanche on YouTube of Pim videos by others still loyal to him. But THIS video should be seen and understood in all of the West, for after all, Pim was not murdered by a Muslim fanatic or group of them as was van Gogh. He was murdered by Volkert van der Graaf, a far-leftist, who admitting to murdering Fortuyn to "protect the Muslims". Fortuyn was also quite aware of the possibility of his assasination, and spoke of this several times in the months before his death, his accusations left to us from beyond the grave. As his predictions proved, a politically correct media that creates a climate that hostile to those succeeding in confronting the threats we face is a danger to us all, wherever in the West we happen to be.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1162706357685930992006-11-04T21:59:00.000-08:002007-04-12T20:15:27.103-07:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1275/2133/1600/Legs.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1275/2133/320/Legs.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />I was appalled, as one would imagine, at the statements of Sheik Taj al-Din al Hilali down in Australia regarding women, "uncovered meat" and rape. Some of his well reported statements are as follows from The Australian as reported by <a href="http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/UncoveredMeat.htm">Islam Watch</a>:<br /><br />"In a sermon during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, Australia's highest cleric and Egyptian‑born Mufti, Sheik Taj al‑Din al‑Hilali, raised an international media stir culminating in waves of condemnation over his claim that immodestly dressed women attract rapes and the fault lies squarely with the women themselves. In the September 27th sermon, delivered in Arabic in Australia's largest mosque in Sydney, attended by 500 worshippers, he said, "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it...whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem." He added, "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred." He added women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men. "It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)", said the Mufti. [The Australian, 26 Oct., 2006]"<br /><br />Much writing has been done on this speech, or rather its translation into English and the questions about translation, but even the Sheik hasn't been able to cover his tracks on this issue. Maybe this is because what he says is insulting to both sexes and so far beyond the pale of being compatible with Western values that it raises again the question of possibilities of integration.<br /><br />Let us be clear on this, he has effectively let men off the hook by declaring them basically unable to control themselves. He has also insulted women who have been victimized by what is seen conventionally in the West as a crime of power and victimization rather than one of uncontrolled lust. His further statement that women are weapons used by satan is perhaps the most appalling, though the most absurd and over the top. Personally, I am simply outraged that anyone would dare to, in a Western country (in which he doesn't even speak the language of his "host" culture), even assert that women should be in their homes fully covered lest crimes be committed. <br /><br />This horrific statement is compounded by the news that a VICTIM of gang rape has been <a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1162378314145&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull">sentenced</a> to ninety lashes in our dearly allied Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Please. Now this is why I am a constant critic of many in the feminist movement here in the US and in the West in general. Veering off into aspects of vegetarianism and abstract notions of linear thinking versus circular helps no one save academics, and certainly doesn't help any women trying to combat these very real abuses of women by outdated notions of sexuality in society. <br /><br />I'm not known for wearing racy clothing in my personal life. If anything, I could basically throw something on my head and be accepted in Muslim circles, or at least by people fond of wool tweed blazers. However, I am also rather into protesting anything that offends me, and Mr. Uncovered Meat has definitely offended me. I am therefore protesting this speech personally, and urge others to follow, by posting pictures of my own uncovered flesh for "incitement" and as my own "weapon" to use in offending these inhuman cretans such as Sheik Uncovered Meat. I have also played a part in starting a contest in this vein at the <a href="http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2006/11/infidel-bloggers-alliance-uncovered.html">Infidel Bloggers Alliance</a>.<br /><br />So tell me folks, are you all riled up and ready to abuse women yet?<br /><br />Technorati Tags:<br /><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/uncovered meat"rel="tag">uncovered meat</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/sheik al hilali"rel="tag">Sheik al Hilali</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/islam"rel="tag">islam</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/women"rel="tag">women</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/rape"rel="tag">rape</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mosque"rel="tag">mosque</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Australia"rel="tag">Australia</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/protest"rel="tag">protest</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1161846789791572562006-10-26T00:11:00.000-07:002006-10-28T22:02:13.240-07:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1275/2133/1600/CAIRChicks.0.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1275/2133/320/CAIRChicks.0.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />Hello Kafir Nation, and thank you for having me! Golly gee, it's kind of hard for me to even remember how this started up. Nevertheless, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/16624604">Ahmed Bedier</a> of <a href="http://www.cairfl.org/">CAIR-Florida</a> and I have exchanged words, shall we say, recently on the web. Actually, I was just called "Mr. Pimp" by Ahmed Bedier over at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=ZgxN0YX-0JM">YouTube</a> this evening because I had left a comment on one of his videos almost a week ago. Allah forbid! I mentioned a historical fact. This seems to enrage Mr. Bedier and causes him to accuse me of spreading lies. However, I can't even begin to lie when I'm still laughing my ass off over being called "Mr. Pimp" by a man who claims that he and CAIR are credible while we "hate bloggers" are not.<br /><br />And why, you might ask, has CAIR representative Ahmed Bedier chosen to blast the entire anti-jihadi blogging community from the <a href= "http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21112856&postID=116157271753389686">comments section</a> of MY blog? I can't answer that one, folks. It may be that he just doesn't know about site meters yet, or that he knew that I'd get that he was doing an impression of the Emperor talking to Luke Skywalker in "Return of the Jedi". Well, that was the tone of it anyway, when he discussed our "weak alliance". <br /><br />But since he is addressing all of us, apparently even LGF, Jihad Watch, etc., I figured I'd cross post some of Mr. Bedier's thoughts on our blogging here.<br /><br />Example #1:<br /><br />Ahmed Bedier said...<br />PIM,<br /><br />Your comment was approved and posted on my blog and I have responded to it. Most blogs are moderating comments. Everyone has to do that these days to avoid the spammers and the radicals. <br /><br />Try posting a message on Little Green F(ee)tballs or (d)ihad watch and you'll quickly find out that it's censored.<br /><br />You have a very distorted view of CAIR and myself. Our actions speak louder than your empty words and threats.<br /><br />Who's trying to silence who? You and your friends are sooooo angry (I've read the hateful comments) that we have a voice on the web?? <br />One of you actually put up some action alert to flag my videos on YouTube, another one has attacks on the guy that makes UmmahFilms? What is wrong with you, don't you have anything better to do? <br /><br />We're speaking up against terror and violence, we're building bridges of understanding and working will the government and law enforcement and we are making a positive impact.<br /><br />I'm sorry that I can not say the same thing for you and your weak alliance. All of you are using some anonymous screen names and are ashamed to publicly share those views. I doubt that anyone of significance will ever actually pay any attention to you.<br /><br />How many of you are quoted in mainstream media?? That's what I thought.<br /><br />3:50 AM<br /><br />-@-@-@-@-@-@-@<br /><br />Oh yeah, I responded. With another post on my blog actually, and a few more on his rather hateful <a href="http://ahmedbedier.blogspot.com/">blog</a>. He has kept it up on his site, on YouTube, and now back at <a href="http://whatwouldcharlesmarteldotm.blogspot.com/">What Would Charles Martel Do?</a> this evening with yet more insults about bloggers. That's right, since people pay him to call me "Mr. Pimp" on the web, he has more credibility than I do. Sorry if I'm not buying that line! More:<br /><br /> <br />Ahmed Bedier said...<br />Wow I didn't know I had such a fan club out there. I should start charging a membership fee. How about hosting a live chat with Ahmed Bedier. We can call it Bedier Raw, I'm joking of course.<br /><br />How do you guys find the time to post and moderate and monitor, do you have lives?<br /><br />I'm not sure I have the time to respond to all your questions and concerns or time to even respond to all the comments left on my blog.<br /><br />But this is an interesting experience.<br /><br />Hate bloggers: understand this, you will never be as credible as CAIR. No one cares about your hateful views. You are very shady folks with questionable backgrounds and motives. Continue to live your fantasy on the Internet.<br /><br />7:16 PM<br /><br />-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@<br /><br />Ooooh, he sure told us! Oh that Ahmed, I've been laughing so hard ever since he called me Mr Pimp that I can't take anything seriously. But I figured everyone could use the update, especially as it was so poorly written....by a paid CAIR representative....OK I'm giggling again. I'll repost the picture that I took of the CAIR-Florida "field trip" for the girls to Tampa's Busch Gardens. I think that picture is upsetting him somehow. I mean, who do you trust when "hate bloggers" from "shady backgrounds" show up with pictures of CAIR get togethers? <br /><br />Feel free to share your thoughts on these subjects with the ever engaging Ahmed Bedier, he might just come up with bad nicknames for all of us in this "weak alliance" before he's done! Or to read my response to his parting shot. It's good to see where CAIR's putting their money though, finally. Paying some guy to call me Mr. Pimp. There you go. SCAIRY. Happy Halloween from CAIR!<br /><br />Cross posted at <a href="http://ibloga.blogspot.com/">Infidel Bloggers Alliance</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1160147260289724672006-10-06T08:04:00.000-07:002006-10-06T08:07:40.310-07:00<strong><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">Malaysia's Jihad against the Singapore Leader</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:130%;"></span></strong><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">By MA Khan</span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:78%;">06 October, 2006</span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">When I landed in Malaysia for a few years in the early 1990s in search of a better living, I was awe-stricken by its success in economic development. Coming from the hardship of South Asia, I marveled at the outstanding advancement and modernization Malaysia had achieved under the stewardship of the then prime minister (PM) Mahathir Muhammad. He defied the West unlike the slavish leaders of oil-rich Middle East countries to achieve it all. Mahathir's anti-West and anti-imperialist rhetoric would inspire me as much as his success in economic development of the country. Mahathir became my instant hero for Muslim world.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><br />On a weekend visit to neighboring Singapore, I was further awe-stricken by the economic success in the tiny nation. And I was equally disappointed by the condition of Malay Muslim community there, who were evidently a poorer community doing all the low-class and low-pay jobs. Muslims were oppressed, exploited and marginalized by majority Chinese people in Singapore. Malaysia treated her minority Chinese people well, who were doing better economically.<br /><br />Such was my fleeting judgments. I knew how the state discriminated against the Chinese and Indian minority communities there. However, Chinese and the Indian were controlling much of the economy. This latter reason was good enough to reach my unfailing judgment at the time.<br /><br />The allure of money landed me in the infidel land in a few years. Of course, after the 9/11, heart has changed [1]. My great hero Mahathir Muhammad has found his true name of the Great Jihadist in my heart, whom I now consider a very dangerous man for the peace of the world. </span><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Continue reading:</span><br /><a href="http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/MalaysiaJihad.htm"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/MalaysiaJihad.htm</span></strong></a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1159947945338797162006-10-04T00:42:00.000-07:002006-10-04T23:31:31.050-07:00<strong>Christian beaten for drinking water</strong><br /><br />Man suffers broken collarbone, dislocated shoulderA Christian man is recovering from a beating that left him with a broken collarbone and dislocated shoulder after he drank water from a glass reserved for the poor at a construction site in Pakistan. The report comes from Voice of the Martyrs, the Christian aid organization with a vision for working around the world to help those who are facing persecution for their Christian faith. The report said Nasir Ashraf, a Christian stonemason, was working on the construction of a room at a school near Manga Mandi outside of Lahore when he got thirsty and took a break.<br /><br />"He drew water and drank from a glass chained to a cemented public water tank next to a mosque, which was reserved for 'all' poor people," the VOM report said. "Returning to the construction site, a Muslim man asked him, 'Why did you drink water from this glass since you are a Christian?'" The man then accused Nasir of polluting the glass, yanked the glass off the iron chain, broke it and threw it in a garbage can. He also summoned other militant Muslims nearby. "This man polluted our glass," he told them. The result was an incensed mob that beat Nasir, yelling that a "Christian dog" drank from their glass.<br /><br />Bystanders encouraged the beating, because it would be a "good" deed that would help them in heaven, the report said.<br /><br />"The attackers pushed Nasir off a ledge onto the ground, and the fall dislocated his shoulder and broke his collarbone in two places," the VOM report said. He was unconscious until he was taken to a clinic, the report said, and the physician who said some people had brought him in also told him never to make that mistake again. Nasir's father took him home and a VOM representative was alerted so that VOMedical could help with his medical treatment and recovery, officials said.<br /><br />VOM was launched by Rev. Richard Wurmbrand, who wrote "Tortured for Christ" about his experiences representing Christ in war-torn Europe. His testimony, and ministry's work, has spread around the globe.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.blogger.com/" ticle_id="51859/">World Net Daily</a>LDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00740524716483882744noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6454169.post-1159681010752939632006-09-30T22:28:00.000-07:002006-09-30T22:36:50.770-07:00<strong><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:180%;">Junior Qaddafi’s Attempt to Placate the Rage of Allah for Father’s Sin?</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:180%;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">by MA Khan</span></strong><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Intro: The Libyan dictator Muammar Ghaddafi's son demanded that Pope's apology is meaningless and instead demanded his unconditional and immediate conversion to Islam. But the sticking point here is his failure to point fingers at his own father who probably is the greatest offender of Islam and Prophet Muhammad alive today; even greater than Salman Rushdie. One must wonder why?</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">---------------<br /><br /><strong>P</strong>ope Benedict’s reference to a quote from the letter of a Byzantine empire, written to a Persian Muslim scholar in 1391, created a violent hysteria across the Muslim world. The Pope quoted the emperor: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."<br /></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">What followed in the proceeding days are known to everybody: burning and bombing of Churches, killing of Christians including an Italian nun in Somalia, many Islamist clerics and militant groups sought the death of the Pope and yet others sought the immediate conversion of the Pope to save his life here and salvation in the life next.<br /></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">What caught my attention is a report in Saudi Gazette, dated 20 September 2006, in which Muhammad Qaddafi, the elder son of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi, demanded the immediate conversion of the Pope to Islam. I quote the report here:<br /></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">"The elder son of Libyan Leader Muammar Ghaddafi has called on Pope Benedict XVI to convert to Islam immediately, dismissing last week's apology from the pontiff for offending Muslims.<br /></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">"If this person were really someone reasonable, he would not agree to remain at his post one minute but would convert to Islam immediately", Mohammad Ghaddafi told an awards ceremony on Monday evening for an International competition to memorize the Holy Quran. "We say to Pope - whether you apologize or not is irrelevant as apologies make no difference to us". [1]"</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><br />What surprises me is the fact that a much greater offender of Islam lives in his own home and is his own father. Citing the literature compiled by Daniel Pipes in his book on the Salman Rushdie Fatwa [2], Ibn Warraq writes:<br /><br />“Perhaps, the most famous contemporary (blasphemous) Muslim mentioned by Pipes is the Libyan leader, Mu’ammar Qaddafi, whose public statements on Muhammad, the Koran and Islam amount to a blasphemy greater than anything discussed so far. Qaddafi confined Sharia to private matters and in its stead; his own ideas were promulgated in the public domain. He changed the Islamic calendar, mocked the Mecca pilgrims as “guiles and foolish”, criticized Prophet Muhammad and claimed his own achievements were far greater than those of the Prophet. In general, he showed extreme doubt about the truth of the Koran and even the details of the life of the Prophet…” [3]<br /><br />By now, there will be little doubt in anyone’s mind that Muammar Qaddafi remains one of the greatest offenders of Islam alive, even greater than Salman Rushdie. The Pope’s crime against Islam and Allah is nothing as compared to the elder Qaddafi’s. Indeed, just citing someone else’s view hardly constitutes a crime on part of the Pope or anybody else. Although religious leaders have found Qaddafi anti-Islamic and deviant, there has not been any death-fatwa declared against him, no demand for apology, nor any call for regret and immediate submission to the supreme power of Allah and his religion.<br /><br />It now requires asking as to how the junior Qaddafi, not satisfied with the Pope's regrets, demands the latter’s immediate and unconditional conversion to Islam for a non-criminal reference, yet never made a simple reference of dissatisfaction against the greatest offender of his religion. But instead, he lives in perfect harmony with the same man, who should be considered the greatest evil man in his own judgment.</span><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">>> Continue reading:<br /></span><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/QaddafiPope.htm" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Junior Qaddafi's Attempt to Placate the Rage of Allah for Father's Sin?</span></strong> </a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com1